Translate

Showing posts with label Quatrochi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quatrochi. Show all posts

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Klimt "Fishblood", 1898



GUSTAV  KLIMT
Fischblut (Fishblood)

India ink and pen on paper

Image: 40.2 x 40.5 cms (Sheet measures 43.5 x 47 cms)

Signed Lower Right: Gustav

                                    KlimtExecuted: 1898


Bibliography:

1. Ver Sacrum I, Issue # 3, March 1898, Vienna, page 6 (as Fischblut )

2.  Christian Nebehay,Ver Sacrum 1898-1903, Edition Tusch, Vienna, 1975

Ver Sacrum 1898-1903, Rizzoli, New York, 1977; page 110

3. Colin B. Bailey, Gustav Klimt: Modernism in the Making, Harry Abrams Inc., New York, 2001 in collaboration with The National Gallery of Canada, page 89

4. Christian Nebehay, Gustav Klimt, 1960; Beilage Zur Liste: Ver Sacrum, Jahrang I (1898); Issue 3 March 1898, Seite 6 , Cited as "Buchillustration: Fur V.S. (Ver Sacrum ) gez. Gust. Klimt, : Meerjung-frauen auf dem Rucken schwimmend, von grossem Fisch verfolgt"

5.  Fritz Novotny and Johannes Dobai, Gustave Klimt, Frederick A. Praeger Publishers, New York and Washington, Cited on page 308 as a sketch and motif for Moving Water 1898 (Bewegtes Wasser, 1898). It is further cited that Fishblood was originally published in the original 1898 volume of Ver Sacrum I, no. 3, March 1898, page 6. Moving Water, 1898 is cited as plate 94, page 308 in the Novotny/Dobai text.

6. Catherine Dean, Klimt, Phaidon Press, Ltd. London , 1996 (reprinted ’98, ’99, ’01)

Plate #9, Cited as Fish Blood, and mistakenly noted as having the precise dimensions of the Ver Sacrum I , Issue #3 lithograph as 29.8 x 28.8 cms. Dean also mistakenly identifies the provenance as the Historisches Museum der Stadt Wien in Vienna, whereas the work has always been in private collections since the Secession Exhibition of 1903.

7. Alice Strobl, Gustav Klimt, Die Zeichnungen, vol. I , 1878-1903; Welz Verlag, Salzburg, 1980. Illustration from Ver Sacrum March, 1898, Illustration # S 675

8. Gilles Neret,Gustav Klimt 1862-1918, Taschen, Germany 2006; Illustrated page 20 as Fish Blood 1898, and noted on page 94 as Plate 20 below right; also noted as "dimensions and location unknown".

9. Christian M Nebehay, Ver sacrum 1898-1903, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, Munich 1975, page 111 (illustrated)

10. Dr. Ilona Sarmany- Parsons, Klimt, Crown Publishers, New York/Bonfini Press, Naefels Switzerland; 1987; Page 11 (full page plate). Cited as Original Destroyed

11. Dr. Marian Bisanz-Prakken, Nuda Veritas and the Origins of the Vienna Secession, 1895-1905; Szepmuveszzeti Muzeum, Budapest Museum of Fine Arts Exhibition; 23 Sept 2010 -9 January 2011, Full page color illustration p. 69. The catalogue cites (p. 234): "Until recently this most famous drawing was only known as a full page illustration in Ver Sacrum, the indications 18 ½ inches refer only to the framing lines in the reproduction (published illustration), which measures 185 x 185 cms. Since it’s rediscovery, the original work has been shown and published here for the first time".

12. Dr Marian Bisanz-Prakken, Gustav Klimt: The Drawings, Exhibited at the Albertina Museum, Vienna 14 March 2012- 10 June 2012 under the curation of Dr Bisanz-Prakken and published as Fishblood.

13. Dr Marian Bisanz-Prakken, Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line , (3 July- 23 Sept. 2012), also organized in collaboration with the Getty Center's senior curator Lee Hendrix and Dr Marian Bisanz-Prakken of the Albertina. Dr Bisanz-Prakken has also published a new book, while she continues to work on the Supplement to Strobl’s Catalogue Raisonne of 1980, in which Fischblut will be included (in addition to Strobl’s 1980 inclusion as Illustration # S 675). The new text will be organized around the Albertina and Getty exhibitions and entitled Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line, (ISBN 10: 1606061119/ISBN 13: 9781606061114) to celebrate the sesquicentennial of Klimt’s birth. Fischblut is illustrated and discussed in this new text.

PROVENANCE:

Exhibited in the Secession Exhibition, Vienna : Nov.-December 1903 (no. 72)

The Nebehay Gallery, Vienna (?)

Imra Rozsa (sold to Rosza in Geneva, )

Leopoldina Rozsa (by inheritance and legally exported (export license issued by the Austrian government’s Bundesdenkmalamt on 6 July 1959[no. 2225/59]. )

Private Collection New York

 

 

Note: Sarah Jackson (Historic Claims Director) of The Art Loss Register (of New York and London) has generated a 19 page report certifying the work is clear of all claims and enjoys good and uncompromised title in her report of 27 November 2006.

Also Dr. Marian Bisanz-Prakken, curator of the Albertina in Vienna, and past research assistant/archivist of Dr. Strobl, and current author of Dr. Strobl’s Supplement to her Catalogue Raisonne of 1980 (cited above), has confirmed (after conferring both with Dr. Strobl herself, as well as Dr Krug (director of the Nebehay Gallery) in Vienna, that the work will positively be included with correct dimensions and a NY domicile, in the forthcoming Supplement to the Strobl Catalogue Raisonne. Also Sophie Lillie of Vienna has conducted extensive research at the BDA in Vienna, as well as conducted a full and complete vetting of the work with all required clearances; giving the work bona fides of title and authenticity. The actual export license from the Bundesdenkmalamt dated 6 July 1959 (no. 2225/59) was secured citing clear passage from Vienna to New York on that date with knowledge and clearance of the work by the Austrian government for export.

ADDENDUM:

Fischblut (Fish Blood)
after the Szepmuveszeti Muzeum ( Budapest Museum of Fine Arts, 23 Sept. 2010- 9 January 2011) Nuda Veritas: Gustav Klimt and the Origins of the Vienna Secession, 1895-1905 exhibition, the masterwork traveled to and was exhibited at the Albertina Museum in Vienna (12 March- 10 June 2012) in the exhibition Gustav Klimt: The Drawings, curated by Klimt expert and scholar Dr Marian Bisanz-Prakken (Senior Curator of the Albertina). Fischblut (FishBlood) then travelled to the J. Paul Getty Museum (Getty Center) in Malibu, California for the celebrated exhibition entitled Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line , (3 July- 23 Sept. 2012), also organized in collaboration with the Getty Center's senior curators by Dr Marian Bisanz-Prakken of the Albertina. Dr Bisanz-Prakken has also published a new book, while she continues to work on the Supplement to Strobl’s Catalogue Raisonne of 1980, in which Fischblut will be included (in addition to Strobl’s 1980 inclusion as Illustration # S 675). The new text will be organized around the Albertina and Getty exhibitions and entitled Gustav Klimt: The Magic of Line, (ISBN 10: 1606061119/ISBN 13: 9781606061114) to celebrate the sesquicentennial of Klimt’s birth. Fischblut is illustrated and discussed in this new text and will remain on exhibit at the Getty Center until 23 Sept. 2012. Also see the links to the Getty exhibition, in which Fischblut is prominently featured:

http://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/klimt/video.html







 




Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Final Epilogue- Klimt affair

There has been a complete and utter Dismissal with Prejudice against Quatrochi Art Agents, Ltd., with a settlement paid by opposition counsel and Wachter. The work is free to be sold without any legal hindrance whatsoever.

Quatrochi Fine Art Agents, Ltd.
quatrochi@aol.com

Friday, July 24, 2009

"Klimt case"

Josh Baer's submission to 'The Art Law Blog' (Zaretsky), then appropriated by the Maine Antique Digest (Hewett):
Friday, June 13, 2008

Klimt Case
Josh Baer:"Maggie Wachter has sued Paul Quatrochi alleging he reneged over the $1.2 million purchase of a Klimt drawing and she has also sued Day & Meyer alleging they will not return the artwork to her."
posted by Donn Zaretsky at 2:19 PM
<<
MY REPLY to the Maine Antique Digest (David Hewett), Josh Baer, and The Art Law Blog (Donn Zaretsky):

Forums > Klimt "Fischblut" : Wachter v. Quatrochi Art Agents, Ltd. et al
Reply
Paul Quatrochi
Posted: 07/23/09 18:59
Maine Antique Digest Article of 2008:Would-be Seller of Klimt Sues Would-be Buyer for $1.2 Millionby David Hewett On June 5, a woman in Austria filed a lawsuit against New York City's Quatrochi Art Agents, Inc. for $1.2 million. Also named in the suit was the moving and storage firm Day & Meyer, Murray & Young, Corp. Maggie Wachter brought the suit against the art firm's owner, Paul Quatrochi, for failing to complete the contract that both signed on April 18, 2007, whereby Quatrochi was to buy Wachter's Gustav Klimt drawing Fischblut for $1.2 million.Wachter's suit claims that she completed her part of the agreement by arranging for the drawing to be stored at the New York City facilities of Day & Meyer, Murray & Young, a 15-story building on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, where it was to remain until Quatrochi came up with the full purchase price in the form of a certified check. Quatrochi was given 150 days after the date of signing to do that.According to the suit filed by Wachter's lawyer, Timothy McInnis, the Klimt drawing was not to be removed from the storage facility without Wachter's written consent. The suit alleges that the deadline for payment passed with no certified check, and when Wachter tried to get her drawing back, Day & Meyer refused to turn it over to her.McInnis, when asked if Wachter questioned that the drawing was still at Day & Meyer, said it was his firm's policy not to comment on cases still in litigation and declined to answer the question.Maggie Wachter appears to be an international citizen. When she needed a witness for her signature on the contract in 2007, she was in Europe, and the witness was Barbara Ensslin, the U.S. Consul at the U.S. Embassy in Vienna, Austria.
© 2008 Maine Antique Digest*******************************

Paul Quatrochi's Reply:
Dear David Hewett: Regarding the Klimt in question, Ms. Wachter's counsel is ill-advised and his inaction verges nearly on legal malpractice. We have stated that the requisite due diligence regarding title (specifically the sale of the work, Fischblut in 1938 Vienna, in the height of the Nazi occupation of Austria) needed to be exhaustive and thorough, and would require sufficient time until I and my client were fully satisfied that the work was not a spoil of war. The provenance of the work was utterly misrepresented by Ms. Wachter, and had to be entirely deconstructed, employing extensive research, scholars, and governmental authorities. Any purported breach is solely due to the extent of the research my client contracted me to do, as his agent.At variance to your published representations of Wachter's counsel, we have consistently endeavoured in good faith to return the work to Wachter or her counsel, with our offer having been consistently declined. We also have made proposals to buy out Wachter's interest, with no reply. I should also clarify that the action was levied against a dormant NYS corporation, and not me personally- the corporation having been altogether closed and dissolved. Such conduct has baffled me and my attorneys, and perhaps Wachter ought seriously rethink her choice of counsel. I ought add that neither I nor my counsel was ever contacted by the Maine Antique Digest at any time for comment, and hence the belated counterpoint to your stunningly unprofessionally one-sided exegesis of the matter in question.
PAUL D. QUATROCHI
***********
Quatrochi Fine Art Agents, Ltd.(New York)
Office: (212) 722-3700 /Fax: (212) 987-7669
Worldphone: (917) 560-8534
E-mail: Quatrochi@quatrochi.com
Website: http://www.quatrochi.com/

Quatrochi Reply as a Post-Script:
Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Art Law Blog - "Klimt case"
PS: I think in the interest of truth-telling, I am surprised by the short-sightedness of Wachter's counsel, who expect the exercise of a mere option and agreement to buy a drawing, to trump, eclipse, or enjoy a higher priority than my higher duty to the international art markets, to prevent any potentially ill-gotten gains and spoils of war from being 'sold' to good-faith BFPs (as well as similar acts of spoliation)- only furthering and contributing to the litigious character of the art world. As I have previously said, all good-faith sellers of good character have never forbiddden me in past time from doing my requisite due diligence and research- all conducted at the instruction of the buyer, for whom I dutifully serve as 'agent'. Also as previously stated we have offered on endless occasions to return the work from safe-keeping (D&M) to Wachter's counsel with our offer consistently being declined, or our consistent offer to buy out Wachter's interest with no reply. This is baffling and untoward conduct from opposition counsel that I have never seen before, and certainly confusing enough to befuddle the NYS Bar Association's Disciplinary Committee should Wachter choose to engage them.
Posted by quatrochi at 12:22 PM 0 comments